Total Final Fantasy countdown by Sony and Nintendo including all rereleases of games to all their platforms for each company:

Nintedo: 26

Sony: 19

You can go count them yourself! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Final_Fantasy_media

Well recounting from the link post above, I actually get 25 for Sony and 28 for Nintendo (Not counting any of the remakes or re-releases for either, e.g. FF1 on NES and GBA counts only as 1 for Nintendo). Now of course you miss out on 1/2 of the main series with Nintendo, but you get none of the Crystal Chronicles series at all with Sony. As I said before, if you only want to look at the main series, then sure, call it for Sony, but there is still a lot of Final Fantasy out there on other platforms and I defintely wouldn't say its at home on the Playstation.

maybe but there is a mayor difference. Nintendo is mostly rereleases plus Crystal chronicles. 

The quality of the titles is completly different. 

The fact remains that Nintendo is just missing so much titles whereas Sony has them all (except one) And also look at the sold units 3 quarter are just from Sony. There is simply no comparision just take for example the amount of money square invested in the developing of the titles.

if there is a Home for FF then it is definetly the Playstation you cant deny that. FF7 FF8 FF9 FFX FFX-2 FFXII its a whole decade. Also FFXIII is not available on Nintendo Platforms. And also not FFXIV or VS13.

Sonys Final Fantasy titles>Nintendos Titles. Because Sony contains the best of them plus adds new ones. 

And crystal Chronicles is really nothing big, nice but all of them combined are not as important as one of the main line. 

 I listed the titles:

Main Series

FF1 NES/GBA/PS/PSP

FF2 NES/GBA/PS/PSP

FF3 NES/DS

FF4  DS/SNES/GBA/PS

FF5 SNES/GBA/PS

FF6 SNES/PS/GBA

FF7 PS

FF8 PS

FF9 PS

FF10 PS2

FFX-2 PS2

FFXI PS2

FFXII PS2

FFXIII PS3

Spin Offs and other FF related games

FF Tactics PSP/PS

FF Tactics GBA

FF Tactics Lions PSP

FF Tactics A2 DS

FF4 after years Wii ware

Dirge of cerberus PS2

Crisis Core PSP

FFXII Revenant Wings DS

FF Legends GB

FF Adventures GB

Mystic Quest SNES

Dissidia PSP

FF Gaiden NDS

Crystal Bearers PSN/WII

Chocobo Games

Chocobo Dungeon 1 PS

Chocobo Dungeon 2 PS

Chocobo Racing PS

Chocobo Dice PS/GBA

Chocobo Tales NDS

Chocobos Dungeon Wii

Cid and Chocobos Dungeon DS

Chocobo 2008 NDS

Crystal Chronicles

6 times Nintendo

If we take the DS remakes in account which are practically a new game we have about 28 different Nintendo games. And 23 different Sony games. But look at those games Nintendo wins because of the spin offs and low budget games. Games which most people never heard of that is just no comparision to the titles for the Playstation. Ofcourse they have some great remakes on DS and some legendary exclusive NES/SNES games, but if we subtract the trash Sony would win definetly.

Everybody who looks on the list knows that one FF7 counts for atleast 4 chocobo games. And look at the upcoming titles:

Upcoming Final fantasy titles

FFvs13 PS3

FFXIV PS3

FF Agito 13 PSP

@ Katilian

I said IF there is a Home for FF its definetly the PS. From all consoles FF released the Playstation is the most tied with Final fantasy because of the titles which are ONLY available on Playstation and not anywhere else. Its ofcourse no exclusive franchise but there is no Console out there which could be called a better home for Final Fantasy then the Playstation.

@ Netyaroze: take it easy there fella. Final Fantasy has no "home". It's been on so many platforms, it's a multiplatform franchise pur sang.

Lol I know that Its not an exclusive franchise and I also know that its a Multiplat franchise BUT

IF there would be a home then it would be the Playstation. Because it has the most exclusive FF main line games.

Ofcourse there are different versions on PC Xbox Wii Snes DS and so on. But no console has almost all of the important ones except the Playstation.

This is an argument you cannot win. There is no way to define "important" ones, because it's entirely subjective.

With important ones I mean the ones which are the most important for the people and for the developer and for the economy. Important ones are the ones which sold the most or are valued from the market as a milestone which I can see through general opinion press. Important games are important for many reasons like they actually keep the company in the game and DEFINE what FF is. Its the main series you cant say that FF4-5-6-7-8 is not more important to the majority of people then Chocobo Dungeon 2. 

The company sees them as more important the company invests 10 times more work money time in the main line games and also there is more press about the games and they are also more important for the economy. And more important for the history of gaming. So these titles I would consider as important. The definition of the word gives you a clear result. Which cant be doubted because it may be opinion but there is also an objective perspective in the word important. 

Well then wouldn't you call FF1 as being the most important, since that pretty much saved Square from going under...

Also have you played those FF remake games on the PS1? The load times are horrible and make the games really hard to play. It's not just FF, but remakes like Chrono Trigger as well.

"Crystal Bearers PSN/WII"

when did the wii's crystal bearers go on PSN?

There's nothing to prove because your assertion is based entirely on circumstancial evidence.  You do not have the contract, nor do you have credible inside knowledge.  The burden of proof is on you because you are making unsubstantiated claims.

Furthermore, there is nothing unethical about these business arrangements.  If they were not do everything legally available to maximize profits/marketshare, they would be in breach of their corporate duty to their shareholders.  This is entertainment, there is no harmful damage or liability to the consumer.

This is no different than the whining about moneyhatting as if it were a bad thing.  Well tough shit, it happens - go QQ some more about it.  No doubt MS gives incentives to entice developers to develop on their platform, whether it be advertising, lowered costs for development tools, better dev support and better tools.  They're a software company first and foremost.