By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Killzone 2 or Halo 3?

 

Killzone 2 or Halo 3?

Killzone 2 221 54.17%
 
Halo 3 187 45.83%
 
Total:408
RVDondaPC on 06 February 2010

Halo has all the best game options and such but if i'm playing by myself it's Killzone 2 by a wide margin.

P.S. Halo has the worst art design ever.



Around the Network
Munkeh111 on 06 February 2010
Squilliam said:
Halo 3 because its got a lot more replay options, coop, 4 player local and its one of the best balanced online modes out there. Killzone 2 is really a late 80's shooter once you're over the graphics impact.

Care to explain?



De85 on 06 February 2010

Halo 3 for me because it's just a tone of fun. Granted my time with Killzone has been limited, but from what I have played it wasn't even close for me.



Draven26 on 06 February 2010

KZ2 is far superior in my opinion. Every time i play Halo 3 its just a frag fest



Andysw on 06 February 2010

Oooooo, 50-50.



Around the Network
Squilliam on 06 February 2010
Munkeh111 said:
Squilliam said:
Halo 3 because its got a lot more replay options, coop, 4 player local and its one of the best balanced online modes out there. Killzone 2 is really a late 80's shooter once you're over the graphics impact.

Care to explain?

They were both over-inflated due to hype anyway except Halo 3 never had as good graphics compared to the competition at the time whilst Killzone 2 got a lot of 10/10 graphics scores. So take away the graphics inflation and you have another Resistance Fall of Man 1/2 type game. A late 80s shooter along the same vein as Call of Duty 5. 



Tease.

Munkeh111 on 06 February 2010
Squilliam said:
Munkeh111 said:
Squilliam said:
Halo 3 because its got a lot more replay options, coop, 4 player local and its one of the best balanced online modes out there. Killzone 2 is really a late 80's shooter once you're over the graphics impact.

Care to explain?

They were both over-inflated due to hype anyway except Halo 3 never had as good graphics compared to the competition at the time whilst Killzone 2 got a lot of 10/10 graphics scores. So take away the graphics inflation and you have another Resistance Fall of Man 1/2 type game. A late 80s shooter along the same vein as Call of Duty 5. 

Why late 80's? Is it because of the new cover system, the great enemies, the great feel of the shooting or the 32 player online mode with variable game modes which is just incredilbly fun to play....

Anyway, you can't just ignore graphics, it adds to the immersion, and the effects are SO stunning it really does make you enjoy the game more



IllegalPaladin on 06 February 2010

In my opinion I'll vote Killzone 2.



Squilliam on 06 February 2010
Munkeh111 said:
Squilliam said:

They were both over-inflated due to hype anyway except Halo 3 never had as good graphics compared to the competition at the time whilst Killzone 2 got a lot of 10/10 graphics scores. So take away the graphics inflation and you have another Resistance Fall of Man 1/2 type game. A late 80s shooter along the same vein as Call of Duty 5. 

Why late 80's? Is it because of the new cover system, the great enemies, the great feel of the shooting or the 32 player online mode with variable game modes which is just incredilbly fun to play....

Anyway, you can't just ignore graphics, it adds to the immersion, and the effects are SO stunning it really does make you enjoy the game more

Because Killzone 2 is a great but not excellent game to me. They all have their pros and cons and you can't sum up the whole of the parts with a feature list.

As for graphics, I have never enjoyed a game more because it has had better graphics than average at the time of release. Going back to the game with other games having surpassed it then it doesn't add as much as say tighter gameplay would have.



Tease.

Andysw on 06 February 2010
Squilliam said:
Munkeh111 said:
Squilliam said:

They were both over-inflated due to hype anyway except Halo 3 never had as good graphics compared to the competition at the time whilst Killzone 2 got a lot of 10/10 graphics scores. So take away the graphics inflation and you have another Resistance Fall of Man 1/2 type game. A late 80s shooter along the same vein as Call of Duty 5. 

Why late 80's? Is it because of the new cover system, the great enemies, the great feel of the shooting or the 32 player online mode with variable game modes which is just incredilbly fun to play....

Anyway, you can't just ignore graphics, it adds to the immersion, and the effects are SO stunning it really does make you enjoy the game more

Because Killzone 2 is a great but not excellent game to me. They all have their pros and cons and you can't sum up the whole of the parts with a feature list.

As for graphics, I have never enjoyed a game more because it has had better graphics than average at the time of release. Going back to the game with other games having surpassed it then it doesn't add as much as say tighter gameplay would have.

If graphics don't matter, then hd doesn't matter as well?