Killzone 2 or Halo 3?

[Andysw]

Squilliam said:

Munkeh111 said:

Squilliam said:

They were both over-inflated due to hype anyway except Halo 3 never had as good graphics compared to the competition at the time whilst Killzone 2 got a lot of 10/10 graphics scores. So take away the graphics inflation and you have another Resistance Fall of Man 1/2 type game. A late 80s shooter along the same vein as Call of Duty 5. 

Why late 80's? Is it because of the new cover system, the great enemies, the great feel of the shooting or the 32 player online mode with variable game modes which is just incredilbly fun to play....

Anyway, you can't just ignore graphics, it adds to the immersion, and the effects are SO stunning it really does make you enjoy the game more

Because Killzone 2 is a great but not excellent game to me. They all have their pros and cons and you can't sum up the whole of the parts with a feature list.

As for graphics, I have never enjoyed a game more because it has had better graphics than average at the time of release. Going back to the game with other games having surpassed it then it doesn't add as much as say tighter gameplay would have.

If graphics don't matter, then hd doesn't matter as well?