By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - The Hostility Against Disruption.

http://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/the-hostility-against-disruption/

This is one of the most interresting Malstrom articles that I have read in a while. It is explaining why support for Wii by the game industry has been so low.

So, do you think game companies are scared of the Wii's disruptive ways?

And what do you think about his theory that the industry deliberatley destroyed Sega and wanted Nintendo destroyed too? (Ronster316 I hope you are reading this)



I LOVE ICELAND!

Around the Network

I kinda pity Malstrom in a way, in the huge expanse that is the gaming world, he can only seem to find one subject to write about. Its like he publishes the same article every time.
If he wants us to listen, how about writing something we haven't read before?



It had some new stuff in it to make it worth a read.^



I LOVE ICELAND!

It's the internet mummel he has a lot of space to type, it's his blog. ^_^



I'm Unamerica and you can too.

The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread: 



The Hunt Begins 4/20/2010 =D

Lol, what a tool.
Nothing new here; Nintendo are awesome and do not make mistakes, they are bullied by the evil developers and hardcore gamers are mindless morons that are being exploited (the casuals are not so, despite being the ones buying the cheap, mindless drone games).
He even uses the good old "PS3 has no games and the 360 only breaks" arguments that 99% of us in here laugh at now and claims that the gaming industry doesn't care if they die...
No, I'm quite sure they don't want to keep on living and making money, brilliant deduction.

KungKras; this is the same bloated, narrowminded fire and brimstone, holier than thou crap from Malstrom as always assuming the same things and containing the core Malstrom elements; I'm evil, anyone who likes good games such as me are evil (funny that he calls all Wii fans in here zombies since they enjoy Ninty's 1st party hardcore titles and yet they adore him), developers are evil, Nintendo is the Jesus of the industry and, last but not least, he knows best.

I'm sick to death of this guy, the few valid points he has drowns in his narcissistic drivel, as usual. Take a piece of humble pie, Sean, and realize that the world has nuances and that people (even your most avid fans who orgasm at your every word) will tire of this eventually.



Around the Network

does the Wii have little support ? as far as I know it has the most exclusive titles and the most titles in total releasing for it this years and the last years

projects for "HD consoles" probably have higher budgets on average, but they also are fewer



@Mummelmann
Well, today we learned that brick-and-mortar book shops have been disrupted by Amazon. That's new to me, and it certainly brings a new light on what Malstrom thinks disruption is.

Anyway, going back to the OP: I simply don't believe in Malstrom's big bogeyman. I don't think that there's an evil entity ( the "Game Industry") that became separated from the light side of the Force ( the "Gaming").
I think that there's lots of studios, and publishers, and indie developers, and journalists. There are economic interests, there are different ideas about what development should be like and what journalists' and publishers' roles should be, and what gaming is about.

I -just today- watched all the bonus featurettes of Uncharted 2. In the many interviews of Naughty Dog's crew I saw some very talented artists, game designers, writers and coders. All passionate about their job, happy about the hierarchy-free and bureaucracy-light environment, and obviously immensely proud of the result of their work.

Should I think that these are minions of the evil Game Industry because they don't aim for the same kind of gaming experience that True Gaming represents in Malstrom's eyes, and they would probably shun developing on the Wii even if they were not under some business obligation with Sony?

I am a developer, though not a game developer, and I can relate to them. There are passionate people for which a job is not just the way to earn enough money to pay the bills and buy food. And some of these people will love to express their personal -dare I say intellectual- growth into increasingly complex works of craft and projects.

Would many people rather appreciate simpler, more immediate works ( the disruptive ones, the True Gaming according to M.)? Sure, but that's an economic problem of the creator: as long as it works for them we should be happy if they at least cater to a minority of the public - to which I personally belong.

As such I see no malice or hate in Infinity Ward's or Id's stance on Wii development. I see no hate or fear in SE when they don't have a Wii version of FF XIII or XIIIvs planned. They are not expression of a big Gaming Industry being afraid of disruption. They're simply people wanting to do their things the way they like, the way they know, the way they think they can be better at. It might not be the most business-savy decision if you only measure revenues, but the public and the critics will judge them through their works.

People eat much more bread than elaborate dishes. More bread needs to be produced every day than novell cuisine or cajun. And yet I don't think that a chef that is in the midst of a twenty-year long career in such elaborate, niche specialization could be forced to make just bread day-in day-out with any joy or passion. And maybe not even with great results, when it comes to the bread she/he will make.

Let's look around for more bread makers, let's ask ourselves how come nobody wants to make bread, as it is great every day. Asking the chefs to stop doing their thing or saying that they are part of an evil, bread-afraid conspiracy won't take us far.



"All you need in life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain

"..." - Gordon Freeman