twesterm said:
vizunary said:
gorgepir said:
@vizunary your list is not complete |
I know it was not complete, I didn't want the post to be a mile long, but just look at the averages, a 70 for KZ on PS2, not great but it isn't just complete shit like some want you to believe. And 77 for KZ: Liberation, it was an excellent shooter, especially for a handheld. I never said that they were the super duper shiz nit of gaming, I was simply trying to point out that they were not the crap some say. |
You may have known that it wasn't complete and it got a 77 on Metacritic but I'm guessing you didn't include any score below an 84 with a majority of the scores a 90+ for a purpose other than you didn't want a list a mile long. It's a lot more fun to be misleading and make people think the game you're defending is perfect rather than let people see all the scores. |
I never said it was even great, let alone perfect. Don't put words in my post. I was in fact never particularly fond of the first Killzone, or any other FPS for that matter, I enjoy them but they are usually rentals, or I only own them for a month b4 they get traded in. I am enjoying KZ: Liberation quite a bit right now. I meant to include the avg in the first post anyways, plus it's not like I only included the top 5 reviews or anything, I think there were at least 10 or more in each list. I was simply pointing out that they were not absolutely horrible like some were making out. Remember you can always find shit reviews of any game, you give me Game of the Year, any year, and I can find an "official" review that says it's just a shiny turd.
Anyways, that's not even the point of the thread. I personally do have high hopes for KZ2. If it's as good as they say, then maybe I'll have another FPS to add to my permanent collection of games I actually keep, right now there is only Black, and it was $20 and I get to blow the hell out of everything when I'm in the mood to.