By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Rate the PS4 and XB1 first-party exclusives

ArchangelMadzz on 06 June 2015
Ruler said:
ArchangelMadzz said:


Produced by some guys there but it was developped using the team from From Software, and a Director from From Software, I'd hardly call it first party. If it was a combined effort between studio Japan and From Software then maybe. But all the grunt work/programming and art direction was from From Software the Producers just would've overseen development and thrown in a few ideas every now and then and progress tracking. 

Same reason why FH2 isn't first party. 


Sony Japan came up with the Design i think and the original built until FromSoftware made it to a Souls Game.

 Masaaki himself states its a co devoloped

http://blog.us.playstation.com/2014/06/10/bloodborne-coming-exclusively-to-ps4-in-2015-new-details/

"Bloodborne is a new collaboration for us, being developed by FromSoftware and produced by SCE Japan Studio."

It still wasn't developed by a first party studio. That's the collaboration, it's not like 2 dev teams worked on it. Just insert my last comment here.



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

Around the Network
Wagram on 06 June 2015

Sony owns the Bloodborne IP. It's first party meaning it will never come anywhere else.

Debating basic things such as this defeats the entire purpose of the thread.



ReactiveLeek44 on 06 June 2015

This is a pretty pointless thread tbh, but overall I give the Xbox exclusives a 9.0 and the PlayStation exclusives a 8.0.



NobleTeam360 on 06 June 2015

Why does it matter who developed the game? as long as the ip is owned by Sony/ or MS then it doesn't really matter as the game is still first party. At least that's how I see it.



aLkaLiNE on 06 June 2015

These lists should include exclusives that are -not- cross platform, regardless of who develops it.



Around the Network
Dusk on 06 June 2015

I have only played Knack and it was abysmal...
Knack 1/10.

For me, it was not fun and because of that became very arduous. More like work than play.



Gotta figure out how to set these up lol.

Dusk on 06 June 2015
Ruler said:
Killzone: Shadow Fall 7.5
Knack 8
Infamous: Second Son 7.5
Driveclub 7.5
Bloodborne 10

XB1
Forza Motorsport 5 5

Upcoming exclusives (Announced or Confirmed to be in development) (Expected personal ratings within a 0.5 range):
PS4
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End 8.5
Gran Turismo 7 8
God Of War IV 8

XB1
Halo 5: Guardians 5
Forza Motorsport 6 5
Gears Of War 4 6
Fable: Legends 4


How can you rate something that isn't out and you haven't played? This makes no sense to me...



Gotta figure out how to set these up lol.

Dusk on 06 June 2015
Ruler said:
ArchangelMadzz said:


Produced by some guys there but it was developped using the team from From Software, and a Director from From Software, I'd hardly call it first party. If it was a combined effort between studio Japan and From Software then maybe. But all the grunt work/programming and art direction was from From Software the Producers just would've overseen development and thrown in a few ideas every now and then and progress tracking. 

Same reason why FH2 isn't first party. 


Sony Japan came up with the Design i think and the original built until FromSoftware made it to a Souls Game.

 Masaaki himself states its a co devoloped

http://blog.us.playstation.com/2014/06/10/bloodborne-coming-exclusively-to-ps4-in-2015-new-details/

That would still make it Second Party, not first. 



Gotta figure out how to set these up lol.

Dusk on 06 June 2015
Wagram said:
Sony owns the Bloodborne IP. It's first party meaning it will never come anywhere else.

Debating basic things such as this defeats the entire purpose of the thread.


Second party actually. 



Gotta figure out how to set these up lol.