Which was greater at their peak, Rare or Retro?

[curl-6]

archbrix said:

curl-6 said:

Highest high point I meant; volume of output isn't really a fair comparison as it's much easier to pump out SNES/N64 games quickly compared to Gamecube and up.

@bolded:  I did consider that, but at the same time, developers weren't as experienced with 3D development in the N64 days and to sustain such a high quality across so many titles during the primitive 3D era was amazing.

Either way, if you meant highest high point then I guess I should have voted for Retro.  Oops.

True, I don't mean to downplay Rare's achievements, it's more just that by the time Gamecube rolled around it wasn't really feasible for one studio to pump out games as rapidly as Rare did in their prime.