| Veknoid_Outcast said: I actually think it's totally fair to insist a system has "no games" if none of them satisfy you. It's not the responsibility of the individual to appreciate everything a company puts out, or to care if others like the line-up. If Nintendo puts out 50 games, and I dislike them all, well, then there really are no games. Here are the problems, though:
This is totally fine, by the way. But you shouldn't weigh in with such confidence if you're not spending the time and energy to properly experience a game library. And I'm not talking about so-called "casual" players. They're playing their favorites and living their lives. I'm talking about us. |
I highly disagree with that opening sentence: You can insist that a gaming system “has no games for me” or “has no games that I’m interested in,” but to say because the system lacks a library which fits your preference thereby must not have much of an offering (i.e. “has no games… period.”), that’s very different.
Also, it’s not about being against others holding a business accountable for their output; it’s more about convincing others to have an open mind for their own personal enjoyment’s sake. For somebody to say “Switch 2 has no games!” and be responded with “Of course it does. Look at X, Y, and Z.”, that’s not a case of bootlicking: that’s a case of “well have you considered trying these games?”
