CourageTCD said:
And yet he was found not guilty. How come? Because these stuff you brought up are exaggerated, misleading or straight up untruth information. You speak as accusations like sexual assalt are impossible to be proven, but that's not true at all. These types of accusation can be proven true if you have good evidences of it, but in Michael's case, they simple weren't, in none of the more that 10 accusations against him. Testimony were contradictory and people involved were clearly wanting to gain money from Michael. From Evan Chandler, Jordan Chandler's, who wanted money from Michael to begin his life as a screenwriter in Hollywood to Janet Arvizo, Gavin Arvizzo's mother, who had alredy used their sons to support her fake testimony against a security guard of a J.C. Store for sexual harassment. These stuff can be checked on internet, I'm not making this things up. |
OJ wasn't found guilty either. P-Diddy was cleared of a lot as well. It isn't a semantics game, but a real thing. Not guilty is not the same as innocent. Burden of proof (and it should be this way) is beyond a reasonable doubt.
rtx 4090, 32 gb ram, i7-13700k
Switch 2







