By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CourageTCD 15 hours ago
Edit Thread
pikashoe said:
CourageTCD said:

These two jurors said they were pressured by the other jurors and the other jurors said they were lying. It's these two juror's words against all the others. Even if they were really thinking MJ should have been convicted, they were still in minority and MJ would still be considered not guilty. As for these extremely hard to prove you mentioned, which one were you talking about? The molestiong a minor count, the intoxicating a minor to molest him, the attempted child molestation, the conspiration to hold a whole family captivite or extortion? Or you're telling me that all of these accusations are extremely hard to prove true?

Where have the other jurors called them liars? I've looked and can't find anything to back up what you're saying. I have found that more of the jurors thought that he did molest other children but there wasn't enough evidence for this specific case. If they continued to vote him as guilty it would have been a hung jury, it needs to be unanimous one way or the other. It's all of the accusers, families and witnesses against MJs word. Yes they all are extremely hard to prove. 

There are more accusers. A kid was able to accurately describe MJs penis. Unidentified Semen was found in his room. Porn was found throughout his home. Nude photos of children were found in his home. His bedroom was alarmed. In the late 70s he spoke about 30 year olds marrying 10 year olds in other cultures in a positive way. Kids fingerprints were found on pornographic material in his house. There are literal photos of him holding half naked kids. He slept in the same bed as children. The letters to Jane Doe saying how in love he was with her. Etc.

Also there are allegations of animal abuse. 

And yet he was found not guilty. How come? Because these stuff you brought up are exaggerated, misleading or straight up untruth information. You speak as accusations like sexual assalt are impossible to be proven, but that's not true at all. These types of accusation can be proven true if you have good evidences of it, but in Michael's case, they simple weren't, in none of the more that 10 accusations against him. Testimony were contradictory and people involved were clearly wanting to gain money from Michael. From Evan Chandler, Jordan Chandler's, who wanted money from Michael to begin his life as a screenwriter in Hollywood to Janet Arvizo, Gavin Arvizzo's mother,  who had alredy used their sons to support her fake testimony against a security guard of a J.C. Store for sexual harassment. These stuff can be checked on internet, I'm not making this things up.