By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pikashoe said:
CourageTCD said:

He wasn't investigated continiously for more than a decade, but was in two differents points more than a decade apart, which is still something to be considered. And the evidences brought up by the plainfitt were just weak, not enough for him to be found guilty of any of the 10 counts he was indicted: Jackson was indicted on four counts of molesting a minor, four counts of intoxicating a minor to molest him, one count of attempted child molestation, one count of conspiring to hold the Arvizo family captive and conspiring to commit extortion and child abduction. There were a lot of accusiation and not a single one of them were proven to have happened

Two of the jurors said they thought he was guilty but were pressured into aquitting. As I said earlier these are extremely hard to prove fully, and rarely end in a conviction. There are about a dozen other accusers, some of which are awaiting trial. All these people spent a lot of time with MJ. We know he spent a lot of time alone with these children. If it was anyone other than MJ this would be a huge issue. 

These two jurors said they were pressured by the other jurors and the other jurors said they were lying. It's these two juror's words against all the others. Even if they were really thinking MJ should have been convicted, they were still in minority and MJ would still be considered not guilty. As for these extremely hard to prove you mentioned, which one were you talking about? The molestiong a minor count, the intoxicating a minor to molest him, the attempted child molestation, the conspiration to hold a whole family captivite or extortion? Or you're telling me that all of these accusations are extremely hard to prove true?