By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
firebush03 said:
Chrkeller said:

Maybe.  Fever has a review average of 76, while users are at a 7.5, seems spot on.  MK World is 7.0, with 86 review.  The 7.0 doesn't bother me, the game is a bit boring IMO.  I have played it the least amount of all MK games.  Pokemon is getting ripped, no idea why, other than GameFreak is awful at optimization.  

On the other side Dk has a 8.9, which is quite high.  BotW is 8.7 user average, which is quite high.  Tears is 8.5 for the S2 via user average.  Prime 4 is 7.8, which is spot on reviews of 78. 

Doesn't seem that off the mark, with the exception of Pokemon, which is GameFreak incompetence to make a game that runs in accordance with hardware power.      

As a reference point Ragnarok has a 94 average review and users have it as a 8.3..  I mean BotW and Tears for the S2 are both higher than Ragnarok.  Perhaps I am missing something, but I don't see excessive "hate" for the S2.  

Edit

TLoU2 has a meta of 93 and user of 5.9...  I just don't see anything unique to the Switch 2 on this one.  Seems normal.

Wow MKWorld has gone way up… that was sitting in the low 5s at launch and had been in the mid 6s last I checked. Fever checks out, maybe it just got berated at launch. ZA was in the 3s at launch lol but its significantly up it seems.

I’ll have to pull up some old threads. MC User Scores have trended upward especially now that more ppl are getting their hands on the system (so ppl who actly play these games are reviewing them, instead of it just solely being review bombers).

Jesus.  lows 5s or 6s for MK World is insane.  the game is good, really good  



rtx 4090, 32 gb ram, i7-13700k

Switch 2