By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
firebush03 said:
Chrkeller said:

I would have to take you word for it.  I never signed up for Face, Twitter, etc.  

I’d also point toward MC User Scores— specificially MKWorld, Pokémon Legends Z-A, MTFever, as well as any and all of the NS2 Editions so far. I’m sure I can come up with something lore concrete though this is all that’s coming up ATM.

Maybe.  Fever has a review average of 76, while users are at a 7.5, seems spot on.  MK World is 7.0, with 86 review.  The 7.0 doesn't bother me, the game is a bit boring IMO.  I have played it the least amount of all MK games.  Pokemon is getting ripped, no idea why, other than GameFreak is awful at optimization.  

On the other side Dk has a 8.9, which is quite high.  BotW is 8.7 user average, which is quite high.  Tears is 8.5 for the S2 via user average.  Prime 4 is 7.8, which is spot on reviews of 78. 

Doesn't seem that off the mark, with the exception of Pokemon, which is GameFreak incompetence to make a game that runs in accordance with hardware power.      

As a reference point Ragnarok has a 94 average review and users have it as a 8.3..  I mean BotW and Tears for the S2 are both higher than Ragnarok.  Perhaps I am missing something, but I don't see excessive "hate" for the S2.  

Edit

TLoU2 has a meta of 93 and user of 5.9...  I just don't see anything unique to the Switch 2 on this one.  Seems normal.

Last edited by Chrkeller - on 04 May 2026

rtx 4090, 32 gb ram, i7-13700k

Switch 2