By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LegitHyperbole said:
IcaroRibeiro said:

There are less quests in BG3 but they are better than the ones in DOS2. The issue with DOS2 quests is they generally have only one way to be solved, and there are very few iterations and consequences of those quests. Generally speaking most NPCs in DOS2 are programmed to have a fixed set of actions (either against you or as allie) while in BG3 things are more open in how you engage dialogue

Something that always annoyed me in DOS2 is how I almost never can solve conflict with dialogue, as someone who enjoys table top RPGs it was always jarring how everything in act 1 seemed designed to fight you lol 

DOS2 twice and there isn't a lot of choice but cause there's such a shear amount of content the path you cut through it is what ends up being completely different, I suppose unless your on a conpletionist run every playthrough but ya, I see it now. 

It's only true in mid the very early in Fort Joy (which you can leave in many different ways), mid act 2 and act 4

In act 1 to first half of act 2 you absolutely need to do almost everything available unless you wanna risk to get severely underleveled because the XP curve is ass in early game 

The major differences on DOS2 comes down to who you are using, since you can only use 4 characters some quests and dialogues will only be present when you have those characters in your party. This creates a more interesting mid and late game (act 3 and 4), but still suck in early game