Norion said:
He specifically said your statement about architecture mattering more than raw horsepower was not true, not that architecture wasn't important so he clearly wasn't arguing against those points in that response. If you think he's wrong about raw horsepower mattering more you should actually back up your claim instead of arguing against something he didn't say there. Also bozobanana is right, you really are acting childish over this by implying he might be lying about owning a Switch 2 for no good reason and other nonsense like the GPU comments. |
Architecture does matter massively when you are talking about a 7+ year difference in architecture, I didn't think I had to spell that out specifically because I would think people would do their homework and know that GCN 2.0 (the PS4) is 7 years older than Ampere, but apparently I had to point that out as I guess that wasn't common knowledge or common sense?
Of course there will be a large difference between Ampere and GCN 2.0 (PS4) ... like does that seriously need to be explained and dumbed down? Just like Ampere will be dwarfed by a GPU architecture from 2027 (7 years afterwards). That shouldn't even be a controversial statement at all, jeeezus.
If you want to side track the discussion, y'know it's not terribly hard to find GCN 2.0 GPUs (PS4 class) ... go see if the configs of those AMD cards that are roughly in line with the PS4 (so like not cherry picking the highest config GCN 2.0 card) can run Star Wars Outlaws, Assassin's Creed Shadows and the like. Frankly I don't care, I don't even know why someone wanted to fall on their sword to defend the PS4's honor in a thread that isn't even about the PS4, lol. Like who cares. This topic isn't about the PS4.
Last edited by Soundwave - on 13 January 2026






