By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zkuq on 07 January 2026
Edit Thread
JEMC said:
Zkuq said:

...That game has absolutely no right to be so demanding. Don't get me wrong, it looks great, but I'm getting the impression they're doing a lot of fancy stuff for very little benefit, and it should be possible to scale down the game easily without making it look that much worse. This smells like poor optimization if I've ever seen any, and what a time it is for such (V)RAM requirements.

I agree that it's not the best moment to ask for so much RAM, more so to run the game at 1080p.

I don't know, I want to believe that they're trying to cover their asses with higher than usual requirements just so they can use them as an excuse when some gamers complain about how it runs.

The VRAM thing is, in part, understandable and, after Indiana Jones, more games will do the same. But it will still be weird to see someone with, say, an RTX 3060 12GB play this game while others with a 3080 won't be able to.

Maybe, maybe.

Chrkeller said:

32 gb system ram for a game that looks average? yeah, that seems fricking weird.

I think the visual design and the technical side aren't really playing well together, leading to the technical side not really shining but still resulting in high system requirements anyway. Maybe someone with more eye for the technical side can correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I'm thinking right now.

Last edited by Zkuq - on 07 January 2026