By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hardstuck-Platinum 2 days ago
Edit Thread
Norion said:
Hardstuck-Platinum said:

This isn't the 2011 version of the game though! It's the 2017 remastered version and it's more intensive on the hardware. If anyone is being a troll it's you for not acknowledging that. So we're all just going to come to the conclusion that BGS was being lazy then? Fine, But someone believing that hardware limitations is more responsible than laziness for there being only 30fps doesn't make them a troll.

First of all I literally replied to a post of yours where you said that the game being from 2011 is something that makes things more concerning so you're not even making a minimal effort at being consistent here. It being the 2017 remaster doesn't change the broad point at all either way though since the CPU's listed in the minimal requirements for the Special Edition are from 2009 and recommended ones from 2011/2012 and the Switch 2 CPU is obviously far above those. And yes that is the obvious conclusion if you had bothered to do any research on it since there's been major complaints about the port such as it having awful input lag.

It's not far above those though. That is factually incorrect. The PS3 CPU is much older than that but it is better than PS4 CPU, and because devs have said Switch 2 has similar power to PS4 CPU, we know that a CPU from mid 00's is better than Switch 2 CPU. I'm not trying to be argumentative or troll here, I just don't like smearing a well respected and successful developer as "lazy" when the platform has components inside that are weaker than what the PS3 had. 

I just don't want the "lazy developer" narrative to go uncontested here. I feel BGS deserved more respect than that. That's all. Having one person here on the other side of the argument is much better than having no-one.