By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hardstuck-Platinum said:
Norion said:

Can't help but notice that you've completely ignored Zippy's reply that disproves what you've been saying. Even putting that aside people shouldn't need to explain to you why the Switch 2 should be able to ran a 2011 game that ran ok on the 360 at 60fps. You should try to make your trolling attempts at least somewhat convincing.

This isn't the 2011 version of the game though! It's the 2017 remastered version and it's more intensive on the hardware. If anyone is being a troll it's you for not acknowledging that. So we're all just going to come to the conclusion that BGS was being lazy then? Fine, But someone believing that hardware limitations is more responsible than laziness for there being only 30fps doesn't make them a troll.

First of all I literally replied to a post of yours where you said that the game being from 2011 is something that makes things more concerning so you're not even making a minimal effort at being consistent here. It being the 2017 remaster doesn't change the broad point at all either way though since the CPU's listed in the minimal requirements for the Special Edition are from 2009 and recommended ones from 2011/2012 and the Switch 2 CPU is obviously far above those. And yes that is the obvious conclusion if you had bothered to do any research on it since there's been major complaints about the port such as it having awful input lag.