The Road to 160m+ for Nintendo Switch (EDIT: See mod note in first post for new rule).

[Shtinamin_]

firebush03 said:

MadDogg said:

Here’s ChatGPT’s unbiased info/analysis on the 160 vs 155 numbers to support all the fighin’ and a feudin’.

my favourite comment on the 160 “it’s essentially corporate lore” lol  

have fun!

Is this sarcasm? ChatGPT being called “unbiased”? (And 8 people agree??) The prompt you feed ChatGPT will have a major influence on the output you get. For instance, I’m always having to word myself in as neutral of a tone as possible when asking ChatGPT anything; otherwise, it’ll latch onto where I’m leaning and cater to that. (E.g. “Can you give me a non-abelian group of order 4?” ChatGPT: “Sure, here’s an example: [it’s an abelian group of order 4].”)

If I need data-like information and I chat with ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, etc. I always tell it to “give me the scholarly facts, be honest, be real, be critical”

I’ve gotten harsh words that tear down what I my stance originally was and I appreciate them, as it helps me understand my stance’s weakness and outside perspectives.

Here’s to an interesting calendar year of gaming!

Merry Christmas!