firebush03 on 15 November 2025
| MadDogg said: Here’s ChatGPT’s unbiased info/analysis on the 160 vs 155 numbers to support all the fighin’ and a feudin’. my favourite comment on the 160 “it’s essentially corporate lore” lol have fun! |
Is this sarcasm? ChatGPT being called “unbiased”? (And 8 people agree??) The prompt you feed ChatGPT will have a major influence on the output you get. For instance, I’m always having to word myself in as neutral of a tone as possible when asking ChatGPT anything; otherwise, it’ll latch onto where I’m leaning and cater to that. (E.g. “Can you give me a non-abelian group of order 4?” ChatGPT: “Sure, here’s an example: [it’s an abelian group of order 4].”)
