The Road to 160m+ for Nintendo Switch

[super_etecoon]

CourageTCD said:

super_etecoon said:

I will pose this question:

Many have requested a TV only Switch. They’ve requested it by that name. They say they don’t want to pay extra for a screen but they just want to play the Switch games. Again, their words, not mine.

If Nintendo were to have made a TV-only Switch and you were to buy it, would you own a Switch? A TV-only Switch? Would you then be a Switch owner playing Switch games on your device that only hooks up to the TV? Or should that be counted as another console entirely?

"If Nintendo were to have made a TV-only Switch and you were to buy it, would you own a Switch?"
Yes
"Would you then be a Switch owner playing Switch games on your device that only hooks up to the TV?"
Yes
"Or should that be counted as another console entirely?"
No

I hope you didn’t think I was making the opposite point. I’m showing the absurdity of the folks claiming that the Switch Lite shouldn’t count toward the sales of the Switch. Seems like a no brainer to me, but leave it to folks that just want to argue about anything.