Would you say the PS2 had better first party support than the GameCube?

[xl-klaudkil]

Wyrdness said:

xl-klaudkil said:

Doesnt matter. The topic asks 

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/images/forums/icons/forum-page-header.png') no-repeat #ffffff;">Would you say the PS2 had better first party support than the GameCube?

And its clearly be a mile that its not.

Quality of the product or how well it is recieved doesnt matter when the question isnt that.

Sony made a lot and i mean A LOT mote games on ps2 then nintendo on the gamecube.

Quantity is your definition of better support sure but it's not a sole defining factor for everyone, you can make a lot more games than someone else but if that other person has a significantly higher amount of quality in their output and they're still outputting a good amount of titles regardless that for many people can count for more, case point in how far more GC first party games still stand out today than their PS2 counterparts.

Thats also a opinion. Socom is still being played online, god of war are highlt praised games still playable and soo are a lot of ps2 games.

Nintendo just cares about some of there legacy games a bit more then sony does thats verry true.

Doesnt make the sony games bad or unplayable in any way.

When talking about better first party support ofc we talk about the amount of games, or else we can just agree sony's output on ps5 is better then on ps2 becauze their games sell "more" 

Its not thou.