JWeinCom said:
Literally the first response in this thread, which is the also first post in the quote chain you're in right now, says exactly that. |
... and then you have 10+ other comments saying that it doesn't matter that it's from a different developer, with the timing it feels like it was held off deliberately to ask for more money shortly after release. I don't really want to keep posting in this thread, but I kind of have to when you're actively avoiding everything I'm referring to.
My point was, and still is, it being a different developer seems largely irrelevant to the issues the majority have with this. The comments in this thread very obviously support that notion. If you disagree personally, that's fine - but singling out one comment against all the others which support my argument is kind of silly, don't you think?









