Hardstuck-Platinum said:
It was entirely beside the point anyway. Trying to claim that it's better to have Xbox in the market, and taking away Market share from PlayStation is better for PlayStation because it makes them look good is a crazy argument to make. Yes, Sony probably wont inherit exactly all of those 30 million but it will inherit a lot of them and my point still stands. There's really no need to respond to the haters anymore because Xbox is now selling 800$-1000$ XBSX consoles/ROG handhelds and clearly doesn't care about growing market share, and Borderlands 4 was just indefinitely postponed for the Switch 2. So, if you want a decently powerful, reasonably costing console PlayStation is your only option. If you dislike PlayStation, your disliking your only option. It just makes no sense. |
Isn't about half the PS4 userbase still refraining from transitioning to PS5?
75M (PS5) + 58M (PS4) = 133M
133M - 117M = 16M
PS5 is also a bit behind PS4 launch aligned correct? So let's say 14M-15M.
How many of those 14-15 million are brand new gamers vs XB gamers transitioning to PS5?
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
