By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Politics - US Politics |OT| - View Post

Bofferbrauer2 said:
smroadkill15 said:

I'm convinced whoever shot Charlie Kirk was not the Tyler kid. It was someone from behind him due to how the entry wound was back of the head. A slowed down video shows this clearly. From what I saw, yhe bullet wound also doesn't fit with the gun they claimed to have been used. I'm not the conspiracy type but it's seems obvious there is a cover-up happening.

Damn this shooting evolves into a similar conspiracy as the JFK shooting

Man the speculations are off the charts but than again I even have to say there is enough things that I would want answered because it doesn't fit.  One is the weapon and the bullet.  If that gun was truly used to kill CK, there is no way from 200 yards and a neck shot does it not produce a huge hole.  Even if someone modified the round to a lower amount its still going to be very messy.  The gun itself isn't a gun you can easily disassemble.  The whole stock it made of wood and the back pack Tyler was shone wearing was way to small.  They show a video of him running on the roof and nowhere can you see him with that gun.

They say he disassembled that gun on the roof but left the screw driver there than he reassembled it wrapped it in a towel and placed it in the woods.  Why would he even waste the time to assemble the weapon and then leave it behind and what did he use to reassemble it if he left the screw driver on the roof.

Next, he changes cloths to something else than for some weird reason he changes back into the cloths he was filmed wearing.

If the Candance Owens video is to be believed, he than goes to a dairy queen in a third different setup to get ice cream like nothing happened.

last but not least there are tons of videos going around showing when CK was hit with the bullet, his reactions and how his body moved and from those angles it sure did not look like he was shot from the front in the neck with a 30-06 bullet.  

Usually I dismiss a lot of conspiracies because they have way to many fallacies but there seems to be some meat to this one.  I guess we will have to see how this continues.