Cobretti2 said:
curl-6 said:
This I'd disagree with, for instance I'd say in previous generational transitions Gamecube was a step down from N64 in the ambition and innovation of its software, (nothing they did on Gamecube was as impactful as say Mario or Ocarina of Time) that Wii U was a step back from Wii in terms of accessibility and user friendliness, (more cumbersome controller and interface, worse load times, etc) or that N64 was a step down from SNES in terms of the standard framerate going from 60 to 20-30. In fact I'd argue most consoles aren't an improvement in every aspect over their predecessors. |
Your feedback is subjective. I actually liked those two transitions for the types of games I enjoy playing. |
Game quality is indeed a matter of taste; we can still say point to things such as load times getting worse going from N64 to Gamecube, or the OS getting slower going from Wii to Wii U. That's not really what the thread is about though; its more about software strategy.