Switch 2 should have used PS5 strategy regarding physical media

[Sogreblute]

Kyuu said:

As some already suggested, instead of GKC, Nintendo should have gone with cheap and slow cards that require installation into the internal storage (just like PS5's Bluray). Not playing directly from the card won't be as frowned upon as GKC, how can anyone disagree with this? It's literally how the PS4/5 work.

So they'd have two options:
1. Game Cards (expensive highspeed cards that don't require install).
2. Install Game Cards (cheap cards that require an install, but unlike GKC, they have the full game data in them).

That is true, but both still suffer two problems.

1. Storage is very limited. The Switch 2 needs more storage as 256 gb isn't enough. Doesn't help that the micro SD express cards required right now only go up to 1 TB, which still wouldn't be enough.

2. The cost of carts. Even if Nintendo gave that option publishers were avoiding the 32 GB Switch 1 cards even to this day. Only like 16 games used that card (few were from Nintendo). So if they offered a 64 GB and 128 GB Switch 1 option (and 128 GB Switch 2) I still don't see publishers using them.

It's very unfortunate, but either way I just do not see publishers using 32 gb, 64, gb, and 128 gb cards (Switch 1 or Switch 2).

Side Note: If publishers were avoiding 32 gb Switch 1 cards what makes people think they won't avoid a Switch 2 32 gb card that would cost more?