By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Politics - US Politics |OT| - View Post

Machiavellian said:
Shaunodon said:

Literally just one page back: https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9614999

"Once you enter the area of extremism - which is where Charlie Kirk is located in when it comes to politics - then Kirk being not extreme enough suffices as a reason to kill him.

The reason why far-right thinking leads to many more killings than far-left thinking is because the far-right's most common form (fascism) is explicitly about killing and getting rid of political opponents or groups of people who don't fit a clearly defined racial profile."

Cotinuing to spread slurs that dehumanise people. The exact same slur used by the radical shooter even. With many people agreeing.

So can you sum up what you are trying to say.  Are saying that currently people are saying far-right or people who consider themselves far right are being dehumanize as being violent.  Or are you saying people are labeling Charlie Kirk as far right and that is not true and thus dehumanizing him.  

I don't know if Charlie Kirk considered himself far-right. You only have to look what's happening in the world to see how many people either agree or sympathise with him. Many people who share almost no opinions with him, still believe he was reasonable and civil. But almost everyone here seems to truly believe he was a far-right, extremist, fascist or Nazi. They have aligned all of those definitions to be practically synonymous.

If they believe everyone who agrees with Charlie Kirk is a fascist or a Nazi, where exactly do you think that's leading?