US Politics |OT|

[RolStoppable]

JRPGfan said:

He lived with a Trans partner (romantically).
He got visits (in and out) from out of state, trans individuals like two weeks before all this went down.
Neighbor eyewitnesses claim "they were giving off a bad vibe".
Supposedly 6 individuals tied to visits of him, had prior knowledge of the shooting. (insidewire claims fbi is investigating it)

One of them, calls themselves Skylar Webster (not their real name, but self chosen one), wrote:
"You guys... I have something BIG coming soon. Just be sure the check the news, you'll know it when see it wink smily"
(that was 5 days before the shooting)

Like Minuets after the shooting he followed up with:
"Well that's that"  and "another chud bities the dust"

Then going onto do a +like train on any post celebrating the shooting.


Source : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r-6iiZgQO8

Your probably not going to like the guy's video, hes very fight leaning.


"The current best attempt is claiming that after living his whole life in Maga world, one semester at a university turned him into a cold blooded killer."

Nah, he grew up surrounded by right leaning people, probably opposed to "being gay" "furries" and trans individuals.
Guy just kept quiet. He was/is gay found himself a trans boyfriend (girlfriend?)... and that was that.
That's likely not just 1 semester... its living his life suppressing his feelings, and meeting other left wing people that encouraged violence.

The trans partner undoubtedly knew about this, along with these people that visited him and maybe supplied him with weapons ect.

Yes the left does seem like it commits less violence, overall. However it can still happen.

I am going to respond here, because this post of yours is similar to what you posted in response to me in the thread about the state of the forums.

Transsexuality and homosexuality are not left ideologies nor are they left ways to live your life. So when someone is like that, it tells you absolutely nothing about their political views.

It's a wrong assumption to believe that the assassination of a far-right activist must have been committed by someone with left political views, and the same holds true vice versa. Once you enter the area of extremism - which is where Charlie Kirk is located in when it comes to politics - then Kirk being not extreme enough suffices as a reason to kill him.

The reason why far-right thinking leads to many more killings than far-left thinking is because the far-right's most common form (fascism) is explicitly about killing and getting rid of political opponents or groups of people who don't fit a clearly defined racial profile. The far-left has no such equivalent, hence why both sides are not the same despite both having extreme political views.

As general advice, you should not put yourself in a position where you think along the lines of left vs. right, because that's the path to drifting towards extremism over a prolonged period of time. The battle is reasonable vs. unreasonable, so the broad middle of society can actually agree on a lot of things.