Discuss the state of the forums and find solutions

[Chrkeller]

Dismissal of or insults towards the Hogwart's Legacy boycott will be interpreted as dismissal of or insults toward concerns over transphobia.

So back in the day I couldn't have an opinion about the boycott... that is limiting discussion and mods forcing their opinion on me. It happened. And the boycott was stupid because:

"So, why doesn’t J.K. Rowling receive any money from Hogwarts Legacy? The reason lies in the licensing agreement between Warner Bros. and J.K. Rowling. When Warner Bros. acquired the rights to the Harry Potter franchise, they agreed to pay J.K. Rowling a significant upfront fee for the rights to the series. This fee was likely in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

As part of the agreement, Warner Bros. also obtained the rights to create and distribute merchandise, including video games, based on the Harry Potter franchise. Hogwarts Legacy is one such game, and as it is being developed and published by Warner Bros., J.K. Rowling does not receive any direct compensation from its development or sales."

The boycott was going to hurt a studio, not JK, but nobody was allowed to point that out. Was Reset more strict? No idea, I wasn't at Reset back when Hogwarts launched.