Pemalite said:
It's not just "sensitivity" to this stuff... There is actually some legitimate reasons why it's a bigger issue for some, over others. |
I'm aware. My room's TV which is connected to my PC and a PS5 is a 32" LCD from 2010~. I have another 55" 4K display connected to a Switch in the living room, occasionally I'd use/test the PS5 on it. Going back and forth between the systems and displays I got, including my smartphone's OLED screen (Google Pixel now, Galaxy before it) doesn't show huge differences to me. I can barely perceive them without side by side comparisons.
I'm more sensitive to color accuracy. What I usually do is calibrate my displays to look similar to my smartphones. Once that is done, my 1080p TV and phone display are virtually identical for video viewing. I mainly perceive the black levels difference at night with lights off. Picture quality difference is superficial otherwise.
In gaming... the combination of native resolution, anti aliasing, and final output will obviously make a more noticeable difference, but it's not a big deal to me. For instance when I switch from Rebirth's quality to performance mode, the difference is immediately noticeable (the vaseline filter), but I forget about it in seconds. And Rebirth's performance mode is supposed to be the worst case scenario, a nightmare among nightmares! UNPLAYABLE!!! (worse overall than the typical FSR2 and TSR implementations).
But yeah, my PC being underpowered and the PS5 struggling to reach native 4K at 60fps are the main reasons I don't see upgrading to OLED 4K worth it yet. Low resolutions content like 1080p look better on a 1080p display than on a 4K display.








