| KLAMarine said: PS6/PSP2. One is a console, the other a handheld. Both can play the same games. |
With possibly a PS6S model. Maybe.
Assuming the PS6 was a step above PS5 Pro, then I think a PS6S makes plenty of sense.
Question I struggle with is would it make more sense to just put the guts of the handheld as is in a home console and call it a day for $100 less, or would it be better to max out that handhelds hardware performance with a bigger PSU plus upgraded cooling in a home console and charge $50 less or the same as the handheld?
Personally I'd prefer the maxed out PS6S for $50 less or the same price as the handheld. I'd also call the PS6S the main PS6 and the other the Pro model.
Would be kinda funny if this actually happened as myself and others have suggested that Nin do this for SW2. Put the guts in a home console and charge less.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
