By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoloDust said:
Chrkeller said:

I think this is a fair assessment.  Most current gen ports will be top out at 30 fps, which everyone is entitled to their opinion there.  Some graphical cut backs, resolution mostly fine via DLSS.  

I haven't played it yet, it is on my wishlist, but I will be going PC.  

I'll be shocked if the game is offered physically on cart.  120 gb, even if cut back is a tough order.  

It's 87GB on XSS - lot of lower quality assets, aimed at 1080p.

Oh, and definitely play on PC, some things like global illumination and volumetrics are, even on XSX/PS5, lower than lowest on PC - not to mention that PC version has Path Tracing option, which, though it kills performance (you drop to 40-50%, depending on the scene), looks splendid.

Fair point.  Getting 87 gb down to 64 gb via lowering resolution and using DLSS..  yeah, seems possible, yeah?  

Yeah, I fully intend, moving countries at the moment, giving Indiana a play this winter.  I want to demo path tracing just to see it.  Likely I will want to target 90 fps for most of my play, but will certainly check out the various graphical settings.

edit

I am digital only so it doesn't impact me, but I feel bad for physical people, key cards are just stupid.  I don't see the advantage over digital.   



i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED