Chrkeller said:
Biggerboat1 said:
We don't just get to pick definitions of established terms to suit our arguments. Diminishing returns does not mean 'negligible'. A simple google will tell you that it means; 'proportionally smaller profits or benefits derived from something as more money or energy is invested in it.' I & others have repeatedly pointed out how those graphs are textbook examples of diminishing returns, so for you to turn around at this stage and announce you've been operating with a completely different (and wrong) definition of the very term that this whole discussion has hinged on is again, very lame. I don't understand why some posters find it so difficult to acknowledge that they've moved positions based on new info or convincing arguments from others, there's nothing wrong with that - it's the healthy thing to do. You asserting that you've been right the whole time isn't convincing anyone, we're all aware of your original positions, I just don't get the stubborn refusal to acknowledge reality. I think overall you're a good poster & meaningfully contribute to the forum but I do remember in your previous stint that you'd paint yourself into a corner then refuse to admit any error or acknowledge moving position - the example that springs to mind was something to do with UK motorways/driving rules... Anyway, I think you'll find yourself in far fewer bickering matches if you stop letting your ego drive the car, just saying. |
The irony being I'm right about the UK rules. I have a UK drivers license. The people telling me I'm wrong, which I'm not, do not. Hell one of them hasn't even been to the UK and other has never driven a car. The issue all stimmed, not that anybody will admit it, they thought I was making fun of their policy. I wasn't. I think it is safer. As far as fps, fair enough I should have picked my verbiage better. The gap gets smaller, especially past 90 fps. But 90 fps has an absolute tangible benefit, especially once you get used to it. I'd be curious who actually took the time to demo the UFO Test. I know HaloDust did. The UFO test, for me, is very clear in demonstration of the benefit. But to be fair, my verbiage wasn't as accurate as it should have been and has caused unnecessary back and forth. Edit I'm also sincerely curious if anybody here will change their position via prime 4 at 120 fps. |
Fair enough, I do live in the UK but don't drive so won't open that can of worms again.
I did the UFO test though it maxed out at 60fps... I'm on a galaxy 23 ultra so pretty sure it should go up to 120...
I'll def try MP4 at 120fps, though to me the question isn't whether people can tell the difference between 60 & 120, but if it's a big enough difference to warrant devs allocating all of that CPU & GPU resource to achieve it, instead of spending it elsewhere.
