| Chrkeller said It always amazes me when people won't accept being wrong. The article demonstrates the average player benefits from fps above 60 fps. You said the "majority" of players don't. Your statement was wrong. Pretty simple. Btw there are other articles as well. As fps goes up, performance goes up. When you say the "majority" it was based on nothing and it is factually untrue. Also enjoy how you picked the graph of perception but ignored the graphs that show an uptake is objective based performance criteria. Like I said, it isn't that look of 120 fps, it is the increased accuracy and responsive controls. The article proves it is a real thing. |
From what I can see from this study the performance & perceived difference of increasing framerate is the very definition of diminishing returns.
You said that diminishing returns doesn't apply to increases from 60 to 120 but that's exactly what these results show.
The 'QoE' & 'Score' differences between 60 > 90 and certainly 90 > 120 border on negligible.
Not sure how you can interpret those graphs as meaning the opposite...
