Do you think you'll end up enjoying the Switch 2 more than the Switch 1 overall?

[Pemalite]

Chrkeller said:

I don't disagree the screen is awful and the battery is meh, but it clearly (overall) is a huge upgrade.  0.3 TF to around 4 TF.  25 gb/s to 102 gb/s.  DLSS, etc.  it is a massive upgrade.

edit

256 cuda cores to 1536 cuda cores.  Some aspect of the S2 are a bit disappointing (lack of VRR docked), but nobody in their right mind can call it a downgrade.  The S2 decimates the S1 in performance.  

There is obviously a massive hardware improvement, that puts Nintendo in the same camp as current generation consoles from a hardware feature-set perspective. 
Teraflops are irrelevant as it doesn't reflect how many TOPS the Switch 2 has.

Switch 2 is a downgrade in several key aspects such as:
* Display. OLED has amazing inky blacks and brilliant colours, with minimal ghosting.
* Battery Life. - With the OLED I can play Breath of the Wild for 5-6 hours. Switch 2? Sometimes less than half that at 2-3 hours. - Guess which one I am taking for that long flight?

A better display and Tegra chip could have fixed both of these issues, but I guess that will happen later with the inevitable "enhanced" console.

The Switch 2 is definitely the successor, but it's also a downgrade compared to the OLED in many areas.