Hardstuck-Platinum said:
Chrkeller said:
Don't see why I should enjoy it more or less than the S1. The S2 is simply an natural iterative upgrade. The S2 is to the ps5 what the S1 was to the ps4. Both the S1 and S2 will have similar games.
Sure the S2 has a bigger screen that is 120 hz, which sounds great on paper, but in terms of quality that is the worse screen I've seen in a decade.
Overall I expect to enjoy to the same degree as the S1.
Edit
Lack of VRR docked is baffling. And I don't like the price of games, way to expensive, especially when Nintendo never does price drops. Odds are I will be buying far less games than I did on the S1. Also I'll never buy game key cards, that is just stupid. Â
|
This isn't entirely true. In some ways it's a downgrade, like the screen for example. Battery life is also a downgrade, even though It's understandable because of the increase in power. Still, the fact remains that in some ways it's a downgrade. See what Pemalite had to say about the screen. That's a cause for concern Imo
Pemalite said:
So far? No.
Medium term? Also no, nothing on the horizon grabs me yet.
I also just cannot come to terms with the e-waste Game key cards and that garbage screen which is an abomination.
There is a reason why I still reach towards my OLED over the Switch 2.
Long term? Who knows. Give me an OLED variant and some big hitting titles...
|
|
I don't disagree the screen is awful and the battery is meh, but it clearly (overall) is a huge upgrade. 0.3 TF to around 4 TF. 25 gb/s to 102 gb/s. DLSS, etc. it is a massive upgrade.
edit
256 cuda cores to 1536 cuda cores. Some aspect of the S2 are a bit disappointing (lack of VRR docked), but nobody in their right mind can call it a downgrade. The S2 decimates the S1 in performance.
Last edited by Chrkeller - on 13 August 2025
