HoloDust said:
I'd say that most of what they're analyzing is quantifiable, but yeah, you can certainly look at low frame rates, low res shadows, DLSS disoclussions, missing features and all other stuff from the subjective perspective of "am I bothered by it?". |
Framerate and resolution metrics are quantifiable, yes, all those are facts, it's more how people perceive them that's subjective.
Otter said:
I think you're forcing a binary. Plenty of people can buy a Switch 1, let alone 2... Not care about high end graphics on the platform and then still completely stay clear of ugly switch 1 ports like Ark Evolved or Mortal Combat One. And again, DF are only in the discussion for talking about Star Wars outlaws, so this is the context. John critiquing a missed opportunity for DLSS in DK isn't really to the point. Their tech review of that game is pretty positive. |
I mean I am one of those people, I enjoy pretty games as much as the next person and I'm a Switch 1/2 buyer who avoided bad ports like Arkham Knight or Ark. I'm an an enthusiast on a dedicated gaming forum though, I'm a minority of the audience.
DF's input is worthwhile and I welcome it. I just think their views on Outlaws need to be seen in the context that they'll have different standards to most Switch 2 players.







