| IcaroRibeiro said: Your point is moot because there are plenty of games on Switch that are exclusive to the hybrid version and cannot be played on Lite version. The existence of said games did not hindered Nintendo to release Lite version anyway There is absolutely a market for home-only Nintendo console. Is that market big? Probably not, but if Lite can do fine with 25 million units sold lifetime I can't see why a TV-only Switch 2 can't survive with maybe 15-20 million units either It would be cheaper than a hybrid, with better life and they could add a few tweaks with the economy in battery and portable components, like more providing more storage. A Switch 2 home with 512GB sold for 400 USD certainly have a good selling potential |
It would be moot if making a version of games was the point perhaps you should carefully read again to get the point here are two clues the Lite retains much of the concept of the original and two Lite is there purely to create multi-unit house holds in other words make it easier to buy your kids or spouse one much like the way it wasn't unusual to have two to three DS' or 3DS in a house a TV version is very limited in offering the same thing.
The fact that only 25m Lites are sold out of the now 152m Switches highlights my point that the core concept of the Switch is the main appeal and selling point and removing aspects of that lessens appeal. The whole TV version argument reminds me a bit of the Wii HD arguments where people swore it was the way to go but it turned out the was a lot more to it than that.
