Currently Online 
It really comes down to whether or not the leaked clocks are correct at this point.
Docked clocks seem to be what we'd expect given that it is indeed 8N (8LPP/10LPE hybrid.) I am leaning toward the TDP being somewhat higher than Switch 1, though.
The handheld clocks seem ambitious, but Nvidia could've possibly improved low-power efficiency even without a die-shrink. If it were just a cut T234 (reduced core counts and down-clocked, without changing the actual chip), we'd expect a very low clock-rate given what we know about Orin T234, but more was changed than that and we have no idea what the power curve looks like now. 2 hours battery life @561Mhz doesn't seem unreasonable if they were to get more power-efficiency at lower clocks than T234.
I was wrong about the 16WH for the Switch 2 that I posted in an earlier post. Apparently it is 19.3Wh.*
That means the Switch 2 can average around 9.7W total power in handheld mode to last exactly 2 hours. Moderately more achievable than the original 8W I was thinking.
"However, the new console's battery capacity translates to around 19.3 Wh up against an equivalent 40 Wh in the original Steam Deck and 50 Wh in the OLED model. With Nintendo promising a minimum two hours of battery life for Switch 2, that means that all functions of the handheld will consume 10 watts."
Edit:
By the way, 1007 Mhz in docked mode corresponds to 3.094 Tflops, and 561 Mhz in handheld mode to 1.72 Tflops. Not that it tells us much in itself, other than the relative performance of the docked mode vs. handheld mode and a rough comparison to other Ampere chips. Could use heuristics like estimated flops:raster performance ratios to compare to other architectures, but that gets a bit too rough. Nintendo/Nvidia could probably have gotten up to 4 Tflops docked/2.2 Tflops handheld if they went with a Lovelace chip.
