haxxiy said:
That's true for sequential read speeds, but regarding random IOPS and even sequential writes, UFS 3.1 storage is more comparable to a SATA SSD than even a modest NVMe like that Xbox Series one. The NVMe standard consumes way more power than UFS, so yeah, no surprise in these results. |
IIRC the write speed for UFS 3.1 is 1.2GB/s which is still about double SATA SSD speeds of 600MB/s. I'm curious how well the compression/de-compression hardware block on the Switch 2 performs. SD Express Cards only hit around 900MB/s which is slower than internal 256GB UFS memory of the platform. The load time tests for the UFS, SD Express, and Switch 2 cards will be interesting when the comparison eventually gets done.








