UK Supreme Court rules the definition of a woman is based on biological sex

[JuliusHackebeil]

Jumpin said:

I'm wondering what the benefits of this could possibly be?
Because, it's not like anyone has to adhere to their language, and it doesn't seem to be enforceable - because if they try to enforce it, they'll be pressured to overturn it on grounds of discrimination.

It doesn't seem that this anything more than a big discriminatory virtue signal to please stupid people. They're stupid because the people pleased about this gain nothing, and yet are often passionate about harming others and will dedicate energy to do so with no personal gain for them or anyone really.

So, my take on this is pointless agitation, and ultimately nothing more than a virtue signal against a culture of freedom and liberty.

I don't really know, but I presume it is easier now to keep men from female prisons. And some rapist men have already been sent to female prison. Heard about a case in Scotlabd a while back.

And I would presume it is easier to keep men from female sports, where they have stolen sponsors, awardes, honoures and money that would have belonged to women.

And it is not discrimination, if it is not even true. The supreme court believes so. And even though I don't exactly have a survey or something to back this up, I will go out on a limb and say the big majority of people see it that way too. For whatever that is worth.