Torillian said:
classic: "I just think it's funny you guys don't want to talk about the things Musk is finding. I mean neither do I because I haven't read anything about it but I can't believe all you guys are so unhappy with the audit just because it's Musk. I mean yeah you said a bunch of reasons why these things are bad, but I don't want to engage with any of those and will instead just insinuate that everyone else is bad faith and in a bubble because I'm the smartest centrist around." Excuse me while I throw up in my mouth a little. You have brought nothing to the conversation beyond youtube link homework with little commentary. |
A yes attack the messenger, to undermine the message. And to point that out, I made clear the message is about transparency and the audit taking place in the first place. I have no reason to insult you, but clearly you feel offended by something I said. Was it that I mention 'bubble'? Social bubbles do exist, there is nothing insulting in pointing that out. But if you feel offended by that, I would not know why it should but if so, my apologies.
The Forbes broadcast I linked, because Kennedy said it better than I could. Did you prefer I typed it out? I like to keep things short, not write novels in a forum.
Mind reading does not exist by the way. I do not think we'd ever met, but somehow you believe you know me and feel it necessary to express your dislike of me as a person. Not a good way of civil discourse. We might not agree on things, but no need to trow insults around.