XtremeBG said:
Yes, Layden did. However this still doesn't change the fact that you doubt there are such a people mentioning this and I just proved you are wrong for 300th time. Confirming 160.6M produced, doesn't change the fact the the people who I said were talking aren't imaginary. And that in future when Switch get's close to that number, some PS2 lovers may do desperate debates with that 161.8M theoretical max. Your mistake here is that you again tried to make it look like, that I am those future persons or that I say the Switch needs 162M or that I move the goalpost, when all I said was simply that there will be such people, nothing more. And in order for them to shut up for good, 162M would be the number which will kill every doubt and debate they can possibly do. |
It doesnt matter, if you see that then feel free to respond with what Sony confirmed. You continuing to parrot it, makes you look like the desperate goalpost mover. Thats what I accused you of and I know you very well ;). You showing me post from people (Rol) that mentioned the theoretical range before it was confirmed invalid means nothing now, we NOW know the truth. So these people that will do this nonsense you speak of in the future are irrelevant, Sony's word prevails above all. So far, it's just you that continues the push for that NOW invalid range.
So I'll say again, the theoretical range is invalid NOW, so continuing to parrot it now is just a flatout lie or just a goalpost move attempt.