Even though synthetic benchmarks tend to flatter ARM processors, that i5 is still faster than a Snapdragon 8350 in PassMark, which in turn is exactly the same CPU architecture as the Switch 2 (1-3-4 cortex cores) with twice as high clocks. Still a long way to go in terms of optimization, IMO. |
They're pretty close, with the 7300HQ having 10% higher multi-core and the 8350 having 27% higher single-core.
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Snapdragon+8350&id=3930
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i5-7300HQ+%40+2.50GHz&id=2922
But we're expecting the Switch 2 to have quite a different configuration from the 8350 anyway, based on a homogenous A78C setup in a single, 8-core cluster.
At similar clocks to the 7300HQ a 2 cluster A78C setup has about twice the performance of the i5 7300HQ (and nearly 25% higher IPC.)
1010 single-core and 5335 multi-core in Geekbench 5
https://x.com/TheGalox_/status/1462968579150729222/photo/1
versus 657 single-core and 2483 multi-core in Geekbench 5 (edited scores because I just ran Geekbench 5 on my laptop.)
At 35-40% of the performance (assuming linear frequency-performance scaling, which we probably shouldn't, but it's all we got), we're looking at a multi-core ~ 2000 for an A78C @1Ghz-1.1Ghz vs. 2483 for the i5 7300HQ. That's about 80% of the performance of my i5 7300HQ.
----
I'll re-run the test with turbo boost off and the cores pegged at the 2.5 Ghz baseline and see if I can still get around 30 fps.
Last edited by sc94597 - on 15 January 2025






