Do you prefer your TV over a cinema screen?

[LegitHyperbole]

SvennoJ said:

LegitHyperbole said:

Yep they'd really need to film at 60fps. I'd hold out hope though, I'd reckon it will change as the younger generation grow up with smooth frame rates and never experience the soap opera effect. 

The issue is with the lighting and lack of motion blur. Shorter exposure ruins the classic 'film look'. Movies have been playing at higher fps on TV all through the boomer and gen x generations. 3:2 pulldown to put 24fps into 60hz with interlacing. So it's not a dislike of higher frame rates, it's filming in higher frame rates that is the problem / has to mature.

Studio lights having to be brighter to compensate for shorter exposure makes it look different. And less motion blur makes it look more like TV. So in your case better frame insertion is the way to go to reduce stutter.

It would be best of both worlds if the blu-ray master (or streaming) offered 2 tracks. One at 24fps and one with AI enhanced frame insertion at 60 fps. Let a super computer analyze the whole movie (from the source bit rate without compression artifacts) and create intermediate frames, then re-render it all at 60hz.

I'd reckon it'd be much easier to film at 60 and make it look 24fps in Post processing the the reverse of this.