Pemalite said:
Chrkeller said:
I'm more than happy for you to drop the derailment you started. Power matters for ports. Memory bandwidth is the switch 2's biggest bottleneck with ease, hence it flatly 100% matters in this discussion.
But glad to hear you are dropping it.
|
Nothing is being derailed, stop with that blatant lie.
The thread is about whether the Switch 2 will be powerful enough to garner ports.
Again, I have already outlined prior why the Switch 2's lower memory bandwidth will be irrelevant to garner ports.
But even if we excuse that potential scenario... We do NOT know what the Switch 2.0's memory bandwidth or hardware capabilities even are, so to blatantly assert it's going to be inferior in any aspect is thus redundant.
The correct answer is... "We don't know".
The fact that 3rd parties supported the original Switch console with a measly 25GB/s of memory bandwidth verses the Playstation 4's 176GB/s or the Xbox One X 325GB/s of bandwidth, it did really well all things considered.
Because again... And I keep repeating this, there is more to hardware than just the black and white numbers you cling to.
|
Based on numerous leaks the absolute maximum memory bandwidth is 112 gb/s which is a bottleneck. And it will make porting Black Myth, GTA6, Snake Eater and Avowed difficult and time consuming.
No worries if you disagree. But it is a derailment because nobody wants to see us go back and forth on every page.
My logic is sound, logical and on topic. You can be mad all day, but I'm not wrong. Sadly you know it.
