By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
firebush03 said:
sundin13 said:

First of all, Harris isn't President. She has no power over foreign policy over Israel at the moment, so it isn't really accurate to portray current policy as Kamala's policy. She has made it pretty clear that she is more critical of Israel than Biden and seems more willing to enforce consequences against Israel than Biden. You admit that there is a clear difference between the positions that Harris expresses and the positions Trump expresses. That should be the end of this conversation. The two are objectively not identical. 

That said, even Biden is markedly different from Trump. He has been central in the push to get aid into Gaza. Even before this war, when Trump was President, Trump halted humanitarian aid into Gaza. One of the first things Biden did as President was restore that aid. As the war went on, repeatedly, funding was provided for humanitarian aid due to the pressure from Democrats which was resisted by Republicans. These millions of dollars of aid simply would not have come if Trump had his way. Gaza is already struggling under a food crisis. Allowing Trump to gain power would objectively make that worse. Biden also was central to efforts to get this aid into Gaza, taking actions such as Air Dropping aid and negotiating to allow aid to enter through Israel controlled border checkpoints. 

As far as actual military support of Israel, I personally would like Biden to go further in resisting Israel's killing of innocent civilians. That said, they have pushed back publicly against some of the actions of Israel and have withheld certain munitions and threatened to withhold additional munitions if a certain red line were to be crossed. 

We can also look further into Trump's presidency to see some of the more controversial actions he had taken, which likely wouldn't have happened under Democratic leadership. Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moved the US Embassy to Jerusalem, both very controversial actions which inflamed tensions. Further, Trump officially recognized the Golan Heights as part of Israel. Golan Heights is disputed territory which is illegally being settled by Israel in violation of international law. One of these settlements was named "Trump Heights" in acknowledgement on Donald Trump.

EDIT: Quick side note in relation to one minor comment you've made: "The damage has already been done". While a lot of damage has been done, there are still a hell of a lot of people suffering in Gaza. This decision has the power to save some of their lives. The damage isn't just in the past, it is also in the future if we don't choose to act. Step one of that action is voting for Harris. Step two is getting out and pressuring her to do what is best for the people of Gaza. Another massive difference between the two is that Harris can be pressured by voices on the left advocating for peace. Trump will probably just send more bombs if the left tries to pressure him. 

Sources:
Palestinian aid emerges as sticking point in supplemental talks - Roll Call
Biden signs bill that includes funding for Israel, aid for Gaza - The Washington Post
U.S. restores assistance for Palestinians, to provide $235 million in aid | Reuters
El-Sisi and Biden agree to send aid to Gaza via Karem Abu Salem crossing | Israel-Palestine conflict News | Al Jazeera
Why Biden administration says Israel hasn't crossed a red line on Rafah | AP News
President Donald J. Trump Keeps His Promise To Open U.S. Embassy In Jerusalem, Israel – The White House (archives.gov)
Proclamation on Recognizing the Golan Heights as Part of the State of Israel – The White House (archives.gov)

"First of all, Harris isn't President. She has no power over foreign policy over Israel at the moment, so it isn't really accurate to portray current policy as Kamala's policy." When did I make the claim that Harris was responsible for the genocide? I mean, I do believe Harris does hold some responsibility here, let's not act like the VP has no power in this...but I never mentioned anything to this effect in my initial comment. I might be missing something, so please point out if I did so, or maybe if I wasn't clear somewhere.

"She has made it pretty clear that she is more critical of Israel than Biden and seems more willing to enforce consequences against Israel than Biden. You admit that there is a clear difference between the positions that Harris expresses and the positions Trump expresses. That should be the end of this conversation. The two are objectively not identical." Nope. Not end of conversation because the conversation was never about their rhetoric, rather their policy. I expressed in my initial post how they are different in terms of how sympathic she is (not sure why you restate that in your response as if I hadn't already...), but when it comes to what the actual difference will be in enforcement, I said that "I'm no foreign policy expert, but these many many signs seem to indicate that Harris will be a continuation of the Biden administration. I don't know how exactly the different the difference will be, though the outcome will be roughly the same between the two." This is my point. Argue to that, and please stop making this into a competition of "Who's right?". (The best way to argue against what I'm saying: Explicitly provide the policies which Harris will enforce that'll distinguish her from Trump in terms of how the Palestinians will be protected. Also, counter the points that I make which suggest she will still be aggressive on Palestinians.)

"That said, even Biden is markedly different from Trump. He has been central in the push to get aid into Gaza." Please see these four sources and respond accordingly: https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-un-resolution-ceasefire-humanitarian-6d3bfd31d6c25168e828274d96b85cf8, https://www.npr.org/2023/12/24/1221467493/u-s-declines-to-vote-on-un-resolution-to-send-aid-to-gaza, https://www.sanders.senate.gov/in-the-news/sanders-casts-sole-democratic-vote-against-bill-to-send-14b-to-israel/, https://apnews.com/article/un-israel-palestinians-gaza-ceasefire-resolution-vote-350c86ef261bf1a00a2515cf22764de5, https://truthout.org/articles/report-us-has-secretly-sent-israel-over-100-weapons-shipments-in-last-150-days/. It would be greatly appreciated if you did actually sit down and take the time to read these points. I don't udnerstand how you could argue that it's the repubs, when in reality its seemingly a bipartisan agreement to support israel and clentch down on Gaza.

"Allowing Trump to gain power would objectively make that worse." Please cite evidence backing this assertion.

"We can also look further into Trump's presidency to see some of the more controversial actions he had taken, which likely wouldn't have happened under Democratic leadership. Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moved the US Embassy to Jerusalem, both very controversial actions which inflamed tensions. Further, Trump officially recognized the Golan Heights as part of Israel. Golan Heights is disputed territory which is illegally being settled by Israel in violation of international law. One of these settlements was named "Trump Heights" in acknowledgement on Donald Trump." Yep. Never denied that Trump has been far more pro-Israel than Kamala and Joe. What I'm saying is that the Palestinians won't really be noticing any changes. Please address this point.

You just ignored all the points I made demonstrating their differences and then posted some sources which....don't refute anything I said.

You are clearly not worth my time.

If you want, read all the arguments in my post again about the differences between Biden's Israel policy and Trump's and try again. If not, hope you have a good day.