By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
zeldaring said:

@curl-6 you mention why DF found it impressive but they can't even tell the differnce between 176gflops GPU VS a way more advanced 352Gflops GPU so they should just stick multiplaform comparsions instead of there speculation.

No offense mate but you're being ridiculous.

The Digital Foundry guys do this for a living. This is their job. They know far more about the subject than you or I.

You claim to know better than professional graphics analysts, while also claiming not to be able to tell the difference between Wii and Wii U graphics, or that a Wii U game praised by professional analysts has PS2 graphics.

Stop digging yourself into a deeper and deeper hole, you're just making yourself look absurd.

I never said I know more then them but them not knowing how to tell the difference if the wiiu was 2x more powerful then 360 with modern features tells me that no one could look at a game and say we'll yea this more technically impressive unless the gap is massive, I think that proves my point. That's why multiplatform comparisons are the only way to tell a system power I mean at least 10-15. My main point being if x was on a system with 2x the gpu power which df thought how can you call it impressive?

As for the X stop using that as your only defense, it's sad. the game is lacking graphically and pointed out plenty of things even when people said yes ps2 models look better  that destroys your defense or when the city look like ps2 graphics also destroyed your defense cause it does have certain points where it looks horrible and I already stated sometimes it looks like a 7th gen game. I'm also a huge lighting guy like the differnce in gears of war 3 to gears of war 1 was massive. 

Last edited by zeldaring - on 20 July 2024