By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Machiavellian said:
SvennoJ said:

Oh I'm well aware.

It's a choice between a slower genocide and a faster one including annexation of the West Bank.
Between a slightly hesitant puppet and one that idolizes the puppet master.

It's up to Europe and the Global South to step up as Netanyahu and Aipac have the USA by their rapidly shrinking balls.

The USA doesn't care about international law. The US still hasn't paid reparations to Nicuragua as ordered by the ICJ in 1986 instead the USA withdrew from the ICJ in 1985 when they saw an unfavorable outcome coming. And again or rather further under Trump "The Trump administration on Wednesday pulled out of two international agreements after Iran and the Palestinians complained to the International Court of Justice about U.S. policies, the latest withdrawal by Washington from multilateral accords."

And yes Harris is just a slightly more hesitant puppet than Biden.


Maybe Trump in office will quicken the demise of the US as a disruptive world power and healing can start a bit sooner.

You can keep hope alive but it takes way more than just the President to demise the US.  People continue to forget that the President only represent 1/3 of the federal government and even still his powers are well defined and limited.  Even his EO orders can be contested in court, and most are even hard to implement or find funding in certain situations.  So no, one president isn't going to be much impact outside of the 4 years of their term.  No matter what, what is happening in the west bank will remain their issues unless they can get support from way more countries that can impact Isarael outside of the US.  

The US has never cared about International law unless they are enforcing it.  Neither Biden or Harris are puppets, its just not an issue the US as a whole cares enough about to be something political motivated outside of the current status.

I don't know why keep you saying the president doesn't have an impact outside of their terms when it's clearly a wrong statement to make. With all due respect man, you've said numerous times and it's been clarified to you that is not the case, how did women get denied abortion during a Biden presidency?

Also, a good chunk of politicians are puppets, it's not 2016 anymore, read and you find out, sources are plenty including MSM. 

You say it's not an issue the US cares about, but if this was the case, the statement would cut both ways, i.e., politicians wouldn't be doing anything to stop the genocide but more importantly, wouldn't be doing anything fund it with weapons, money and political protection at organisation like the UN etc. But you know very well it's American bombs that are slaughtering children, please spare me the attempts to absolve "your side" from what is clearly a human tragedy funded by our taxes.